Hi, I'm Thomas.
I get brands found in search and AI.

Twelve years in search.
Now on my own.

I've spent twelve years doing SEO, most recently as VP of SEO at a PR Week Top marcomms agency. These days I work with clients directly across the whole of search: technical SEO, content, the lot, plus the newer work of getting brands cited in AI answers.

That last part is where a lot of my attention goes right now. More and more people start a question in ChatGPT or Perplexity before they ever open Google, and most brands haven't caught up. Getting you ranking and getting you cited are the same job done well, and I do both. The difference is that hardly anyone is doing the AI side properly yet.

I've written a fair bit of this down too. The ten-part series on how AI search works walks through the mechanics end to end, from the transformer paper through RAG, query fan-out, and citation share, with every claim sourced to first-party documentation. If you want to see how I think before we talk, that's a good place to start.

Working across a range of businesses means I get to see what actually moves the needle in different markets, rather than guessing from one vantage point. That breadth is what keeps the work sharp.

How I work

I do the audits, the strategy, and the hands-on implementation, and I work directly with the people doing the work rather than handing a deck to whoever signed the brief. The shape is flexible:

  • Fixed-term projects
  • Retainers
  • Day-rate contracts
  • In-house and agency partnerships

If the fit's right, we'll find a shape that works.

What I care about

A few things I've found matter more than anything else:

  • Being straight about what the data says, even when it's not what anyone hoped to hear.
  • Work that compounds, rather than quick wins that don't stick around.
  • Actually shipping it. A strategy doc sitting in a shared drive has never helped anyone.

How I think about the work.

01

GEO and SEO are the same problem.

Getting cited in AI answers and ranking in search both come down to the same things: being a trustworthy, well-structured source that covers its topic properly. The tactics differ, but the foundation is shared.

02

A ranking is not the same as being found.

More and more people start with an AI tool rather than a search engine. That changes what visibility actually means. It's not a future trend. It's already the pattern.

03

The unglamorous work tends to be the right work.

Fixing crawl issues, improving content depth, building genuine third-party coverage: none of it makes a great slide. But it's usually what moves things in a meaningful way.

04

It only counts if it gets built.

A strategy document that sits in a shared drive doesn't help anyone. That's why I stay close to implementation, not just the thinking.

Let's talk about your visibility.

Invisible in AI answers, slipping in search, or both. Thirty minutes is enough to work out where to start.

Book a call